Times Colonist: “Aim Pandora gripes at other governments, city councillor says”

August 7, 2010 at 9:00 pm Leave a comment

Testy e-mail sent to businessman

By Bill Cleverley, Times Colonist August 7, 2010

Robert Randall, chairman of the Downtown Residents Association, hopes Thornton-Joe’s e-mail wasn’t an indication the city is giving up.

“I think we’re throwing in the towel a little soon by just throwing up our hands and saying it’s all in Gordon Campbell’s hands,” Randall said.

Randall believes there are steps that can be taken to stop the Pandora Avenue tent city from becoming a permanent fixture.

Some of the ideas that have been suggested are designating Pandora Green a provincial median which would prohibit anyone from using it to open up other areas of town to camping.

“Once the other neighbourhoods have a taste of what Pandora is experiencing, I think it would be a bit of a wake-up call,” he said.

Read more: http://www.timescolonist.com/news/Pandora+gripes+other+governments+city+councillor+says/3371030/story.html#ixzz0vz2Fk200

I was cc’d all those emails, and Matthews ticked me off for refusing to complain to other levels of government. As if he thinks all City Council has to do is plead a little louder to the Province and Feds.

That said, I do think that there may be more things the City can do to break up the tent city and the associated drive-thru drug supermarket. One of the examples I mentioned in the above article was designating Pandora green as a Provincial median. That means no pedestrians allowed and would also reduce the risk of further traffic deaths like we’ve seen recently. Would I support that? No, I see it as a desperate last resort.

I sent Charlayne a letter of support last night after the story was published but I said that the closure of St. Andrew’s school will be a terrible blow to the area and I don’t think we could survive another one like that. This neighbourhood is really teetering on the edge.

Mat Wright asks:

Rob – correct me if this is wrong. Does the court ruling allowing camping say it is permissible only if shelter beds are not available?

What I know is that the Supreme Court ruling allowed camping if the number of homeless outnumbered the amount of shelter beds. However, the revised City of Victoria bylaw does not mention shelter beds, it only has a few restrictions: no daytime camping, not in certain parks or sports fields etc.)

Entry filed under: City Hall, Harris Green, media, Our Place, safe injection sites, social issues. Tags: , , .

Times Colonist: Pandora homeless troubles soar Advocate: economy-size discounted mouthwash can kill

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Categories

Feeds


%d bloggers like this: